[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value]
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value] |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:29:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
> It’s a little unfortunate that packages are developed together with
> everything else, because this means that there is no way for people to
> opt out of breaking changes until the next release without also opting
> out of getting any updates at all.
It’s both a strength and a weakness I guess. The good thing is that we
can make changes that affect everything at once. The bad thing is what
you mention.
We could use feature branches more, with the downside that they would
probably get little additional testing, precisely because one would have
to choose between features and packages.
Thoughts?
Ludo’.
- Re: Services can now have a default value, (continued)
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/20
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/20
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/21
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/21
- We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/21
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/04/23
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/23
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value],
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Petter, 2017/04/27
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/23
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/04/22
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2017/04/22
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/22