[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value]
From: |
Petter |
Subject: |
Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value] |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:37:49 +0200 |
If I may make a suggestion, coming from a place of ignorance.
How about a stable branch that would be opt-in?
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:29:53 +0200
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > It’s a little unfortunate that packages are developed together with
> > everything else, because this means that there is no way for people to
> > opt out of breaking changes until the next release without also opting
> > out of getting any updates at all.
>
> It’s both a strength and a weakness I guess. The good thing is that we
> can make changes that affect everything at once. The bad thing is what
> you mention.
>
> We could use feature branches more, with the downside that they would
> probably get little additional testing, precisely because one would have
> to choose between features and packages.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ludo’.
>
- Re: Services can now have a default value, (continued)
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/20
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/21
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/21
- We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/21
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/04/23
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/23
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/27
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value],
Petter <=
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/23
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/04/22
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2017/04/22
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/22