Re: [Health] Histopathology results reporting template vs other lab

[Feng Shu]

Yusuf Suleiman <yusifsuleiman@hotmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
> I have suggested a Gnuhealth to be the HIS for the routing results reporting 
> in one pathology laboratory, and I have the following observations.
>
> 1. The results reporting template of histopathology lab is not the
> same with other laboratories such as microbiology or hematology.

> 2. The routine procedures are also different.
> 3. The results reporting template can be modify to fit histology lab
> but only if the institution is not offering other laboratory
> investigation such as chemistry and so on.
> 4. Many institutions may not want to marge different departments/units test 
> reports in a single template.

What does 4 mean?

>
> With this, I am suggesting if possible, different templates for the
> major laboratory departments or units can be created.

Do you mean a major laboratory departments or units map a report
template file? for example:

 1. histopathology > lab_test_histopathology.fodt
 2. hematology > lab_test_hematology.fodt
 3. ...

Or just let report template can deal with major laboratory
departments, with the help of IF directive in fodt?

>
> For example, at a point where we register for the services (under
> products module) on gnuhealth like “urine culture”, we do select if
> the service we are registering belong to imagine or laboratory. For
> that matter, major laboratory departments/units (histopathology,
> microbiology/bacteriology, hematology, and chemical-pathology) can
> come up, So that if I am registering “urine culture”, I can select a
> microbiology in place of the laboratory that we do select.
>
> This will allow for each unit template to be tag with all
> investigations under a selected department.

> Thank you.
> Yusuf Suleiman 
>
> Sent from my iPad

--