[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogofilter behavior
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: bogofilter behavior |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 13:57:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, Aug 03 2004, Harry Putnam wrote:
> The bogofilter mail list seems to be pretty dead.
On <URL:http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/> the last
messages are 3 days old. (I didn't see any message from you on the
list.)
Note that you need to be subscribed:
,----[ http://gmane.org/info.php?group=gmane.mail.bogofilter.general ]
| Group: gmane.mail.bogofilter.general (NNTP, HTTP)
| Status: non-public (requires subscription to mailing list to post)
| Description: general discussion about the bogofilter spam filter
| Url: http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/
`----
> In bogo_spam.in group some false positives occur and I run them back
> thru bogofilter according to my reading of the man pages, this should
> correct any misfiling that occured in bogo data base.
>
> `bogofilter -v -Sn < MSG_NUM (a false positive file name)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You meant "false negative" or you should use "-N" (if I understand
correctly)? "false positive" means "a ham message classified as spam
by the filter".
,----[ bogofilter(1) ]
| The -S option tells bogofilter to register the text
| presented on standard input as spam and to undo a prior
| registration of the same message as non-spam.
|
| The -N option tells bogofilter to register the text
| presented on standard input as non-spam and to undo a prior
| registration of the same message as spam.
`----
You may want to read the following parts of the Gnus manual to do this
more conveniently from Gnus:
(info "(gnus)Filtering Spam Using The Spam ELisp Package")
(info "(gnus)Thwarting Email Spam")
> However some of these false hits have recurred several times and are
> very similar. I was under the impression that the above command would
> tell bogofilter these are not spam. It seems to have no effect.
Training only changes the ham/spam probabilities of the words (and
headers) of that message. It is possible that reporting a false hit
once is not sufficient to change the spamicity from ham (or unsure) to
spam.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior,
Reiner Steib <=
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/04
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/04
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/05