[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogofilter behavior
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: bogofilter behavior |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:23:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004, reader@newsguy.com wrote:
> I've not hooked it up inside gnus since I'm thinking of dropping
> bogofilter in favor of Spamassassins built in bayes stuff.
>
> Do you have any comments as to the pros or cons of either?
SA works fine with good training, but it (currently) the biggest
target for spammers so they try hard to activate its "good" rules. I
get between 5 and 10 spams per week that SA doesn't catch despite
diligent training, and 1 false positive per week (from bestbuy.com for
instance).
I know we have CRM114 and others supported in the spam.el code as
well, if you're looking for options.
Ted
- bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/04
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/04
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/05
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/05
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/08