[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogofilter behavior
From: |
Harry Putnam |
Subject: |
Re: bogofilter behavior |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:19:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:
> ,----[ bogofilter(1) ]
> | The -S option tells bogofilter to register the text
> | presented on standard input as spam and to undo a prior
> | registration of the same message as non-spam.
> |
> | The -N option tells bogofilter to register the text
> | presented on standard input as non-spam and to undo a prior
> | registration of the same message as spam.
> `----
Reiner on a closer look at the above citation I see it is direct
conflict with my man page. Where did you get that from?
I had the right formula according to my man page for version:
bogofilter --version
bogofilter version 0.92.2.cvs
man 1 bogofilter:
[...]
The -S option tells bogofilter to undo a prior registration of the same
message as spam. If a message was incorrectly entered as spam by ’-s’
or ’-u’ and you want to remove it and enter it as non-spam, use options
’-Sn’. If ’-S’ is used for a message that wasn’t registered as spam,
the counts will still be decremented.
[...]
Just the reverse of what you posted.
- bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior,
Harry Putnam <=
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/03
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/04
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Harry Putnam, 2004/08/04
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/05
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/05
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/08
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/09
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Matthias Andree, 2004/08/10
- Re: bogofilter behavior, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/08/10