Re: [Koha-devel] Moving to Arch?

[MJ Ray]

On 2004-09-23 14:18:59 +0100 Joshua Ferraro <address@hidden> wrote:

> Well ... I did use that command (it's farther down in the blog entry):

Well, that will teach me.

address@hidden is your local archive, which is what I was 
rambling about.

address@hidden is a mirror of it, seen on kados.org, 
which seems to be exactly as it should be. You won't use it yourself, 
but I can view it:

; tla register-archive address@hidden http://kados.org/arches/
; cd /tmp
; tla get address@hidden/koha--release2--0.1
* from archive cached: 
address@hidden/koha--release2--0.1--base-0
[big download, so aborted]

Fortunately, a simple merge doesn't need me to do a remote get:

; tla get address@hidden/koha--release2--0.1
* from archive cached: 
address@hidden/koha--release2--0.1--patch-6
* patching for revision: 
address@hidden/koha--release2--0.1--patch-7
* making pristine copy
* tree version set address@hidden/koha--release2--0.1

; cd koha--release2--0.1--patch-7/

; tla replay address@hidden/koha--release2--0.1
* patching for revision 
address@hidden/koha--release2--0.1--base-0
A   
{arch}/koha/koha--release2/koha--release2--0.1/address@hidden/patch-log/base-0

> So does this mean that I can't merge back into the main branch ... 
> that you
> have do do that?  In CVS anyone with devel privs could commit to the 
> main
> repo ... or am I mising something?

Either the RM or their automaton will need to do the merge. This is a 
deliberate model change from CVS which both allows more people to do 
more development tasks without waiting for approval, and allows the RM 
to say "show me the code" before accepting it into the final release 
tree, if they want.

--
MJR/slef    My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
 Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
LinuxExpo.org.uk village 6+7 Oct http://www.affs.org.uk