[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct |
Date: |
Tue, 06 May 2008 09:48:18 -0400 |
Anders writes:
> address@hidden said:
> > I thought that draft_from couldn't be enabled in a .mh_profile so that the
> > installer could restrict its use. To preserve that capability, how about
> > just defaulting masquerade to be enabled instead of disabled?
>
> In this day and age, isn't that an impossible mission? After all, we have
> usespace (nmh or other) process doing smtp towars the smtp server. Any such
> check should, imo, be on the server side. Nothing's stopping the user from
> telnetting to port 25 and try to send the mail with whatever envelope he
> wants anyway.
It's always been that way. I think that we should retain the
original nmh capability, just change the default build configuration.
> Speaking of ports, wny way to use other ports than 25? I'm occationally
> sitting behind an intricate mess^Dh of ssh tunnels...
It looks like it's hard-coded ("smtp") in mts/smtp/smtp.c.
David
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
- [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, Zhang Weiwu, 2008/05/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct,
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/21