[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct |
Date: |
Tue, 06 May 2008 10:00:45 -0400 |
On Tue, 06 May 2008 09:48:18 EDT, David Levine said:
> Anders writes:
>
> > address@hidden said:
> > > I thought that draft_from couldn't be enabled in a .mh_profile so that th
e
> > > installer could restrict its use. To preserve that capability, how about
> > > just defaulting masquerade to be enabled instead of disabled?
> >
> > In this day and age, isn't that an impossible mission? After all, we have
> > usespace (nmh or other) process doing smtp towars the smtp server. Any such
> > check should, imo, be on the server side. Nothing's stopping the user from
> > telnetting to port 25 and try to send the mail with whatever envelope he
> > wants anyway.
>
> It's always been that way. I think that we should retain the
> original nmh capability, just change the default build configuration.
>
> > Speaking of ports, wny way to use other ports than 25? I'm occationally
> > sitting behind an intricate mess^Dh of ssh tunnels...
>
> It looks like it's hard-coded ("smtp") in mts/smtp/smtp.c.
With more and more ISPs blocking outbound 25, should we add code to try to
use port 587 (submission) first, and fallback to 25?
pgpQGQ3HHp69N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, Zhang Weiwu, 2008/05/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cannot get envelop sender address correct, David Levine, 2008/05/21