[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term
From: |
Yoshi Rokuko |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:43:51 +0100 |
Valdis Kletnieks:
> > Unfortunately, for signed mails, it's quite often the case that you will
> > need
> > to re-verify the signature at a later date. If 6 months later you need to
> > produce the mail your boss sent, you're probably going to want to be able to
> > reproduce the signature too.
>
> Actually, let me take that a step further - you *always* need to be able to
> deal with the usage case "Hey, let me forward you the note that Fred sent
> me last month on this - it has everything you need attached".
>
> Which means you need to either keep Fred's actual message around, or enough
> information to regenerate the message. And if Fred included a digital
> signature or encryption, then you need to be able to cope with that as well.
OK, I agree. I was never in such a situation, but I get your point.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jeffrey Honig, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Earl Hood, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jeffrey Honig, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ralph Corderoy, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Mike O'Dell, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Earl Hood, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Yoshi Rokuko, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term,
Yoshi Rokuko <=
- [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Ralph Corderoy, 2011/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] parts is parts, Paul Vixie, 2011/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ralph Corderoy, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ralph Corderoy, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ralph Corderoy, 2011/12/11