[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:18:49 -0700 |
On 2012-03-12, at 9:05 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Since these headers will be specific to the backend transport I would suggest
> ignoring ones unknown to the backend, and giving the backend the ability to
> print warnings, or abort the send, if there are problems processing a
> recognized directive.
The sender should also be able to specify the message not be sent if a
meta-directive cannot be honoured. E.g. trying to specify deliver-by when
using the sendmail transport. Changing <directive> to:
directive = LETTER *(LETTER / DIGIT / "-") *("!")
would make
.deliver-by 86400 N
a request, and
.deliver-by! 86400 N
a demand.
--lyndon
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Paul Fox, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Paul Fox, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, layer, 2012/03/12