Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post

[Earl Hood]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> I would prefer to build these non-822 directives using a syntax that can't be 
> confused with a valid 822 header. I suggest the format:
>
>    metahead = "." directive *(SP params)
>    directive = LETTER *(LETTER / DIGIT / "-")
>    params = ; free-form text to the end of line
>
> In the new syntax the above example would be written as:
>
>  From: address@hidden
>  Sender: address@hidden
>  .mail-from address@hidden

I thought the "X-" prefix was the standard for designating
non-standard headers.  Therefore, for nmh, something like
"X-nmh-" could be the prefix to use for any nmh-based
custom headers.

--ewh