[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:50:57 -0700 |
On 2012-03-12, at 9:26 AM, Earl Hood wrote:
> I thought the "X-" prefix was the standard for designating
> non-standard headers. Therefore, for nmh, something like
> "X-nmh-" could be the prefix to use for any nmh-based
> custom headers.
The IETF consensus is that X-headers are going to die. But regardless, we're
still co-opting 822 header space for non-822 purposes. It's better to just fix
the problem correctly.
--lyndon
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Paul Fox, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, layer, 2012/03/12