[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post
From: |
Robert Elz |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:48:32 +0700 |
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:48:26 -0700
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
| I doubt they'll be used often enough for that to be an impediment.
Very possibly true, but the same applies to using a more normal
looking field name - if no-one uses it much, then even if there
ever was a conflict, it wouldn't really be a major problem (some
people would find it difficult to use whatever new thing it
conflicted with.)
kre
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Paul Fox, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Paul Fox, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post,
Robert Elz <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Paul Fox, 2012/03/12