[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question... |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jun 2019 08:45:17 +0100 |
Hi Valdis,
> pick -from <address> -subject '\[PATCH [45]\.[0-9]'
...
> However, it *also* catches messages of the form 'Subject: Re: [PATCH
> ....' which is unacceptable for the use case in question.
Bakul answered about the anchors. Another approach is to rule out
replies.
-sub foo -and -not -sub re:
-sub foo -and -not --references '_*'
--
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., (continued)
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Andy Bradford, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Robert Elz, 2019/06/08
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...,
Ralph Corderoy <=
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Robert Elz, 2019/06/08