[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...
From: |
Robert Elz |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question... |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jun 2019 16:50:20 +0700 |
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 08:45:17 +0100
From: Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
| Bakul answered about the anchors.
Maybe it would be possible to look for a leading ^ in the user's
pattern (for other than -search), and if found, remove it, and
replace the ".*" that's inserted into the RE with "[ \t]*" ?
That would, I suspect, be more useful, and more in accordance with
what users might expect to happen. Certainly no-one who uses a
leading ^ is expecting it to attempt to match a literal '^'.
kre
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., (continued)
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ken Hornstein, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Andy Bradford, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/12
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Bakul Shah, 2019/06/09
- Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/09
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Robert Elz, 2019/06/08
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question..., Ralph Corderoy, 2019/06/08
Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...,
Robert Elz <=