|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59546] Missing latex interpreter |
Date: | Thu, 1 Apr 2021 05:20:43 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.90 Safari/537.36 Edg/89.0.774.63 |
Follow-up Comment #56, bug #59546 (project octave): @jwe: Thanks. Re comment #51: > Or should I put the borrowed code in a separate file (with the original license text) and #include it in the main program file? @Pantxo: Having that code in a separate file might indeed be cleaner and make it easier to possibly merge changes from upstream in the future. Is that borrowed code very dependent on the rest of Qt? How likely is it that this code depends on specific versions of Qt? Is it possible it'll break in combination with a different version of Qt? But I guess we'd just have to use some configure tests and "#if defined"s like we do for the GUI in that case... _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59546> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |