[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization
From: |
Nicholas Jankowski |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:21:16 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.114 Safari/537.36 |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #60818 (project octave):
patch in comment #4 applies clean to default on my machine. and delaunayn
appears to run fine.
adding to the timing comparisons on discourse:
rand("state", [1:625]');
x = rand(1000,1)*4-2; y = rand(1000,1)*4-2; z = rand(1000,1)*4-2; p =
rand(1000,1)*4-2; q = rand(1000,1)*4-2;r = rand(1000,1)*4-2; s =
rand(1000,1)*4-2;
n = 1000; tic; for idx = 1:n, delaunayn([x,y]);endfor;toc
and adjusting dimension and n as practical:
dim n existing_loop (s) expanded_det (s) factor
block-LU (s) factor
2D 10000 7.91032 7.69139 1.028 7.85065 1.007
3D 1000 35.6323 1.77464 20.07 3.74609 9.511
4D 100 11.4891 0.686602 16.73 2.03804 5.637
5D 100 39.3493 3.55978 11.05 11.7757 3.341
6D 100 155.825 27.9706 5.571 63.8424 2.440
7D 10 54.9079 16.8202 3.264 32.2846 1.700
I'm surprised to see the significant difference of the explicit determinant
over the block-LU approach. I note, though that the `<tau" check is still
different and may be much simpler in that approach. I don't know if this
accounts for some of difference.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60818>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Nicholas Jankowski, 2021/06/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, anonymous, 2021/06/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Nicholas Jankowski, 2021/06/28
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Markus Mützel, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, anonymous, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, A.R. Burgers, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Nicholas Jankowski, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm,
Nicholas Jankowski <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Markus Mützel, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Nicholas Jankowski, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Nicholas Jankowski, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Nicholas Jankowski, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, anonymous, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, anonymous, 2021/06/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Nicholas Jankowski, 2021/06/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2021/06/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, anonymous, 2021/06/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60818] delaunayn - 2D code path vectorization doesn't match nD algorithm, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2021/06/30