Re: [paragui-users] Help with menus...

[Alexander Pipelka]

Yes. It definitely depends on "when" the app object will be destroyed.
If it's in the main loop everythings ok because the destructor of
PG_Application is able to cleanup all objects.

BTW, there's a new static function PG_Application::GetApp()
:)

Alex

Am Mon, 2002-06-24 um 16.09 schrieb Atani:
> 
> Interestingly enough, if i declare it (globally) as:
> 
> PG_Application *app;
> 
> and then in main do: app = new PG_Application(); it doesnt fail out either.  
> So something is perhaps dependent on when it executes... do you use atexit to 
> trigger cleanups?
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Sunday 23 June 2002 13:18, Alexander Pipelka wrote:
> > Hi Mike!
> >
> > That's a really weird one .. :))
> >
> > Ok. Creating the PG_Application object inside main() solves the problem.
> > I haven't fully debugged it till now but it seems there is some
> > confusion in the shutdown/cleanup code.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > Am Son, 2002-06-23 um 19.41 schrieb Atani:
> > > On Sunday 23 June 2002 10:31, Eric Ross wrote:
> > > > Mensaje citado por Atani <address@hidden>:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >       Using the attached code I generate a SIGSEGV everytime i close 
> > > > > the
> > > > > app..
> > > >
> > > > Can you attach some _working_ code ? I mean something we could compile,
> > > > execute and test ?
> > >
> > > Actually, the only thing that is missing from that zip (globals.h,
> > > includes headers, etc... and the main method..)
> > >
> > > I have attached the full source for the client app... its actually a very
> > > basic app thus far that I am doing... The final project will be an online
> > > RPG of sorts :)
> > >
> > > Note, to compile SDL_net is required...
> > >
> > > > I've got what you're describing (SEGV when closing the app) sometimes
> > > > when there's memory corruption(buffer overrun and so). Maybe you could
> > > > try linking with some memory tracer or something(libefence?) to check
> > > > it's really a bug ?
> > >
> > > Thats the really strange part... I believe that I have done something
> > > very basic as to expose the bug it just requires running the app and then
> > > close the app... do nothing in the app... From what I have found so far,
> > > it appears that calling app->Quit() still allows some events to be
> > > processed and when they are processed some parts of PG are already
> > > cleaned up and so the SIGSEGVs are appropriate as an NPE type case.
> > >
> > > Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > paragui-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/paragui-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> paragui-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/paragui-users
>