[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers confere
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13) |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:35:21 +0100 |
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:08:53 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 12/12/22 00:41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the last years we had few discussions on "simplifying" QEMU (system
> > emulation / virtualization), in particular for the "management layer".
> >
> > Some of us are interested in having QEMU able to dynamically create
> > machine models. Mark Burton's current approach is via a Python script
> > which generates QMP commands. This is just another case of "management
> > layer".
> >
> > Various problems have been raised regarding the current limitations of
> > QEMU's APIs. We'd like to remember / get a broader idea on these limits
> > and look at some ideas / proposals which have been discussed / posted
> > on this list.
> >
> > Feel free to complete your thoughts on this public etherpad:
> > https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qemu-emulation-bof%402022-12-13
> >
> > Topic I remember which can be good starters:
> >
> > - Current limitations of QAPI (& QMP) model (Markus Armbruster)
> >
> > - Adding a new qemu-runtime-$TARGET / QMP-only binary without today's
> > limitations (Daniel P. Berrangé & Paolo Bonzini)
> >
> > - Problem with x-exit-preconfig, reworking MachinePhaseInit state
> > machine (Paolo Bonzini)
> >
> > Markus / Daniel / Paolo expressed their ideas on the list (the
> > historical threads are referenced in the etherpad) so reading the
> > relevant threads before the call will help to get in the topic.
> > These people don't have to be in the call, but if they can attend
> > that would be very nice :)
> >
> > The call will be Tuesday, December 13 at 3pm CET on this Bluejeans link:
> > http://bluejeans.com/quintela
> We moved the call here:
>
> https://teams.microsoft.com/_#/pre-join-calling/19:meeting_MjU2NDhkOGYtOGY5ZC00MzRjLWJjNjgtYWI2ODQxZGExMWNj@thread.v2
this one, required to login after which it throws out some license error
whatever.
- Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/11
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Stefan Hajnoczi, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Edgar E. Iglesias, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Peter Maydell, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Mark Burton, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Cédric Le Goater, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Marc-André Lureau, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Mark Burton, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13),
Igor Mammedov <=
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Juan Quintela, 2022/12/13
- Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13), Felipe Franciosi, 2022/12/13