qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers confere


From: Mark Burton
Subject: Re: Single system binary & Dynamic machine model (KVM developers conference call 2022-12-13)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:52:42 +0000

(BTW, really happy that we use another approach for next time - we only used it because we didn’t have another quick choice when the meeting didn’t open….)

 

Cheers
Mark

 

 

On 13/12/2022, 15:52, "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> wrote:

 

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hi

 

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 6:44 PM Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote:

On 12/13/22 15:17, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 09:08, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/12/22 00:41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In the last years we had few discussions on "simplifying" QEMU (system
>>> emulation / virtualization), in particular for the "management layer".
>>>
>>> Some of us are interested in having QEMU able to dynamically create
>>> machine models. Mark Burton's current approach is via a Python script
>>> which generates QMP commands. This is just another case of "management
>>> layer".
>>>
>>> Various problems have been raised regarding the current limitations of
>>> QEMU's APIs. We'd like to remember / get a broader idea on these limits
>>> and look at some ideas / proposals which have been discussed / posted
>>> on this list.
>>>
>>> Feel free to complete your thoughts on this public etherpad:
>>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qemu-emulation-bof%402022-12-13
>>>
>>> Topic I remember which can be good starters:
>>>
>>> - Current limitations of QAPI (& QMP) model (Markus Armbruster)
>>>
>>> - Adding a new qemu-runtime-$TARGET / QMP-only binary without today's
>>>     limitations (Daniel P. Berrangé & Paolo Bonzini)
>>>
>>> - Problem with x-exit-preconfig, reworking MachinePhaseInit state
>>>     machine (Paolo Bonzini)
>>>
>>> Markus / Daniel / Paolo expressed their ideas on the list (the
>>> historical threads are referenced in the etherpad) so reading the
>>> relevant threads before the call will help to get in the topic.
>>> These people don't have to be in the call, but if they can attend
>>> that would be very nice :)
>>>
>>> The call will be Tuesday, December 13 at 3pm CET on this Bluejeans link:
>>> http://bluejeans.com/quintela
>> We moved the call here:
>>
>> https://teams.microsoft.com/_#/pre-join-calling/19:meeting_MjU2NDhkOGYtOGY5ZC00MzRjLWJjNjgtYWI2ODQxZGExMWNj@thread.v2
>
> Please use a video conferencing system that allows people to join
> without logging in and works across browsers. I gave up on Teams.

I also gave up after 27 or so clicks, redirections, emails checks, etc.
Too complex. There are much simpler alternatives.

 

Sorry, similar situation here:

 

"Hmm. Your browser version isn't supported."

 

firefox-107.0.1-1.fc37.x86_64

 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]