|
| From: | Deepak Gupta |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3 12/20] target/riscv: implement zicfiss instructions |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Aug 2024 13:35:16 -0700 |
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:39:15PM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 8/7/24 10:06, Deepak Gupta wrote:zicfiss has following instructions - sspopchk: pops a value from shadow stack and compares with x1/x5. If they dont match, reports a sw check exception with tval = 3. - sspush: pushes value in x1/x5 on shadow stack - ssrdp: reads current shadow stack - ssamoswap: swaps contents of shadow stack atomically sspopchk/sspush/ssrdp default to zimop if zimop implemented and SSE=0 If SSE=0, ssamoswap is illegal instruction exception. This patch implements shadow stack operations for qemu-user and shadow stack is not protected. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com> Co-developed-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com> Co-developed-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com> --- target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 2 + target/riscv/insn32.decode | 17 +- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rva.c.inc | 47 ++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzicfiss.c.inc | 149 ++++++++++++++++++ target/riscv/translate.c | 1 + 5 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzicfiss.c.inc diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h index 226157896d..5ebc4dd5b3 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h @@ -702,6 +702,8 @@ typedef enum RISCVException { /* zicfilp defines lp violation results in sw check with tval = 2*/ #define RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_FCFI_TVAL 2 +/* zicfiss defines ss violation results in sw check with tval = 3*/ +#define RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_BCFI_TVAL 3 #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_FLAG 0x80000000 #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_MASK 0x7fffffff diff --git a/target/riscv/insn32.decode b/target/riscv/insn32.decode index c963c59c8e..c59c992ce2 100644 --- a/target/riscv/insn32.decode +++ b/target/riscv/insn32.decode @@ -65,8 +65,10 @@ # Formats 32: @r ....... ..... ..... ... ..... ....... &r %rs2 %rs1 %rd @i ............ ..... ... ..... ....... &i imm=%imm_i %rs1 %rd +@ss_pop ............ ..... ... ..... ....... &i imm=0 %rs1 rd=0 @b ....... ..... ..... ... ..... ....... &b imm=%imm_b %rs2 %rs1 @s ....... ..... ..... ... ..... ....... &s imm=%imm_s %rs2 %rs1 +@ss_push ....... ..... ..... ... ..... ....... &s imm=0 %rs2 rs1=0No need for single-use formats, or even forcing them into specific argument sets.
Noted.
+{ + # zicfiss instructions carved out of mop.r + ssrdp 1100110 11100 00000 100 ..... 1110011 %rd + sspopchk 1100110 11100 ..... 100 00000 1110011 @ss_popYou can check x1/x5 here: { [ ssrdp 1100110 111000 00000 100 rd:5 1110011 sspopchk 1100110 111000 00001 100 00000 1110011 rs1=1 sspopchk 1100110 111000 00101 100 00000 1110011 rs1=5 ] mop_r_n ... } which will make things easier for the next insn carved out of mop_r_n.
Will fix as you suggesting.
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rva.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rva.c.inc index 39bbf60f3c..db6c03f6a8 100644 --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rva.c.inc +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rva.c.inc @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ * this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ +#include "exec/memop.h" + #define REQUIRE_A_OR_ZAAMO(ctx) do { \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zaamo && !has_ext(ctx, RVA)) { \ return false; \ @@ -114,6 +116,28 @@ static bool trans_amoswap_w(DisasContext *ctx, arg_amoswap_w *a) return gen_amo(ctx, a, &tcg_gen_atomic_xchg_tl, MO_TESL); } +static bool trans_ssamoswap_w(DisasContext *ctx, arg_amoswap_w *a) +{ + REQUIRE_A_OR_ZAAMO(ctx); + /* default for qemu-user, use regular RW memory and thus mmu_idx=0 */ + int ss_mmu_idx = 0; + + /* back cfi was not enabled, return false */ + if (!ctx->bcfi_enabled) { + return false; + } + + TCGv dest = dest_gpr(ctx, a->rd); + TCGv src1, src2 = get_gpr(ctx, a->rs2, EXT_NONE); + + decode_save_opc(ctx); + src1 = get_address(ctx, a->rs1, 0); + + tcg_gen_atomic_xchg_tl(dest, src1, src2, ss_mmu_idx, (MO_ALIGN | MO_TESL)); + gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, dest); + return true; +} + static bool trans_amoadd_w(DisasContext *ctx, arg_amoadd_w *a) { REQUIRE_A_OR_ZAAMO(ctx); @@ -183,6 +207,29 @@ static bool trans_amoswap_d(DisasContext *ctx, arg_amoswap_d *a) return gen_amo(ctx, a, &tcg_gen_atomic_xchg_tl, MO_TEUQ); } +static bool trans_ssamoswap_d(DisasContext *ctx, arg_amoswap_w *a) +{ + REQUIRE_64BIT(ctx); + REQUIRE_A_OR_ZAAMO(ctx); + /* default for qemu-user, use regular RW memory and thus mmu_idx=0 */ + int ss_mmu_idx = 0; + + /* back cfi was not enabled, return false */ + if (!ctx->bcfi_enabled) { + return false; + } + + TCGv dest = dest_gpr(ctx, a->rd); + TCGv src1, src2 = get_gpr(ctx, a->rs2, EXT_NONE); + + decode_save_opc(ctx); + src1 = get_address(ctx, a->rs1, 0); + + tcg_gen_atomic_xchg_tl(dest, src1, src2, ss_mmu_idx, (MO_ALIGN | MO_TESQ)); + gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, dest); + return true; +}Why are these in trans_rva.c.inc instead of in trans_rvzicfiss.c.inc?
encodings are coming out of existing unused atomics and this is why zicfiss is dependent on 'A' extension.
Although if shadow stack are not enabled for the execution environment then it should be illegal instruction. I am fine placing it in trans_rvzicfiss.c.inc as well. Let me know.
+static MemOp mxl_memop(DisasContext *ctx) +{ + switch (get_xl(ctx)) { + case MXL_RV32: + return MO_TEUL; + + case MXL_RV64: + return MO_TEUQ; + + case MXL_RV128: + return MO_TEUO; + + default: + g_assert_not_reached(); + } +}This should be return get_xl(ctx) + 1) | MO_TE; and probably placed next to get_xlen() et al.
Noted.
+ +static bool trans_sspopchk(DisasContext *ctx, arg_sspopchk *a) +{ + /* default for qemu-user, use regular RW memory and thus mmu_idx=0 */ + int ss_mmu_idx = 0;This can't be right, since 0 is M_MODE.
This is 0 only when qemu-user. If not qemu-user, its obtained differently.
+ + /* sspopchk only supported on 32bit and 64bit */ + if (get_xl(ctx) != MXL_RV32 && get_xl(ctx) != MXL_RV64) { + return false; + }Again, where is this prohibited? Even if your implementation doesn't allow RV128 (as certainly it would be a separate code path here) this should be checked at startup, not all over the implementation.
It's a left over from when I was starting out and didn't know a lot on qemu (still don't :-)) and RISC-V. Will remove this and at other places as well.
+ /* + * get data in TCGv using get_gpr + * get addr in TCGv using gen_helper_csrr on CSR_SSP + * use some tcg subtract arithmetic (subtract by XLEN) on addr + * perform ss store on computed address + */ + + TCGv addr = tcg_temp_new(); + TCGLabel *skip = gen_new_label(); + uint32_t tmp = (get_xl(ctx) == MXL_RV64) ? 8 : 4; + TCGv_i32 ssp_csr = tcg_constant_i32(CSR_SSP); + TCGv data = tcg_temp_new(); + gen_helper_csrr(addr, tcg_env, ssp_csr);I think you can skip the helper. You've just validated the extension is enabled: tcg_gen_ld_tl(addr, tcg_env, offsetof(CPURISCVState, ssp));
Yeah that's right, will do that.
+ TCGv rs1 = get_gpr(ctx, a->rs1, EXT_NONE); + tcg_gen_brcond_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, data, rs1, skip); + gen_helper_raise_sw_check_excep(tcg_env, + tcg_constant_tl(RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_BCFI_TVAL), data, rs1); + gen_set_label(skip); + tcg_gen_addi_tl(addr, addr, tmp); + gen_helper_csrw(tcg_env, ssp_csr, addr);tcg_gen_st_tl(addr, tcg_env, ...);+static bool trans_sspush(DisasContext *ctx, arg_sspush *a)Same comments apply. r~
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |