tramp-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

TRAMP, auth-source and Secret Service API "label" prompt


From: Gustavo Barros
Subject: TRAMP, auth-source and Secret Service API "label" prompt
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 17:07:28 -0300
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1

Hi All,

This is a follow-up report, from a discussion which started between Michael Albinus and me at Reddit (https://redd.it/l2dw9j).

The behavior I met, which I thought was somehow "normal" and was trying to disable, was that, whenever I tried to use TRAMP's sudo method (I haven't tested others), I was first prompted for a password, as expected, but after entering the password, I received a second prompt "Enter label for root@localhost (default root@localhost):". I just accepted the default, and the authentication succeeded. And this happened even though I have set `auth-source-save-behavior' to nil.

Well, Michael told me at Reddit this is not expected behavior, so I started playing with my settings in the area, and found the culprit to be my `auth-sources' setting, which was:

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(setq auth-sources '(default
                    "secrets:session"
                    "secrets:Login"
                    "~/.authinfo.gpg"))
#+end_src

Being `auth-source-save-behavior' and `auth-sources' the only options from `auth-source.el' which I (knowingly, deliberately) configure in my init file. That setting for `auth-sources' is literally given as example in (info "(auth) Secret Service API").

It turns out that, if a source which is not from the Secret Service API (`secrets.el') has the highest priority there, the prompt is gone. So I went with:

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(setq auth-sources '("~/.authinfo.gpg"
                    default
                    "secrets:session"
                    "secrets:Login"))
#+end_src

Michael found it strange, as I did, and suggested this should probably be reported to `report-emacs-bug'. So I tried to generate a reproduction recipe starting from `emacs -Q' which, unfortunately, I could not. There is some interaction with something in my init which I could not pin down.

Nevertheless, this bothered me now, so I tried to understand why this was happening. I started following the code trail. The prompt itself is from `auth-source-secrets-create' (in `auth-source.el'), and going up from there I eventually came to `auth-source-search' which is called by `tramp-read-passwd' in the following manner:

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(auth-source-search
:max 1
(and user :user)
(if domain
    (concat
     user tramp-prefix-domain-format domain)
  user)
:host
(if port
    (concat
     host tramp-prefix-port-format port)
  host)
:port method
:require (cons :secret (and user '(:user)))
:create t)
#+end_src

And, indeed, `tramp-read-passwd' is asking auth-source to create a new entry if one does not exist with `:create t'.

What particularly bothered me in this prompt was the fact of being prompted for a "label" to save a password which was never meant to be saved in the first place, since I set `auth-source-save-behavior' to nil. And it appears "create" and "save" are indeed two separate operations for `auth-source', the docstring for `auth-source-search' implies that in: "The token can hold a :save-function key. If you call that, the user will be prompted to save the data to the backend. You can't request that this should happen right after creation, because `auth-source-search' has no way of knowing if the token is actually useful. So the caller must arrange to call this function."

My first thought was thus to condition directly to `auth-source-save-behavior', and I've suggested Michael at Reddit it might be interesting to use `:create (if auth-source-save-behavior t)', so that `tramp-read-passwd' never tried to create the `auth-source' entry if none was found, and none was meant to be saved.

I did test this, and it does work, in the sense that when `auth-source-save-behavior' is set to nil, regardless of the order of the sources in `auth-sources', that prompt does not occur.

But, since then I had what I regard a better idea: why not provide the label? This is pretty much standard behavior for applications which store passwords in the Login keyring. And it is not specially complicated, as the label must exist, but does not have to be unique. The docstring for `secrets-create-item' states this explicitly: "The label ITEM does not have to be unique in COLLECTION."

So, `tramp-read-passwd' could go with something like:

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
:label (concat "Tramp password"
              (when (or user host) " for ")
              (when user (format "%s" user))
              (when host (format "@%s" host)))
#+end_src

keeping the current value of `:create t'.

That would automatically generate a label "Tramp password for root@localhost" for the case at hand. I've tested this, and the prompt is gone for all cases, regardless of the order of entries in `auth-sources'. When `auth-source-save-behavior' is nil, it works as expected (no prompt). And there is a change in behavior when `auth-source-save-behavior' is non-nil, the prompt is also gone, and the password is saved according to the relevant settings with that label (and answer in case of 'ask).

A couple of caveats. First, I really don't know well `auth-sources.el' and just tried to figure out what was happening in this case. As far as I understand the `:label' key will just be ignored by other backends of `auth-source' where it is not meaningful. But someone more acquainted with `auth-source' should probably judge. Second, I'm not sure that particular label I suggested is general enough to cover all relevant TRAMP methods, some further polishing there by someone more experienced in the ways of TRAMP might be needed.

And, well, third, I understand, of course, that the fact I could not generate a clean reproduction recipe with `emacs -Q' does beg the question of whether any change is granted at all, because we really don't know how relevant the "issue" is. So, feel free to disregard the suggestion.

Still, I hope this is somehow useful.

Best regards,
Gustavo.

PS: Please keep me CC's, as I'm not subscribed to the list.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]