adonthell-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present.


From: shirish शिरीष
Subject: Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present.
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 02:52:16 +0530

At bottom :-

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 00:13, Kai Sterker <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2011/7/5 shirish शिरीष <address@hidden>:
>
>> Addition at bottom :-
>
> The autogen.sh output has some warnings, as one of the test programs
> has been halfway removed, but otherwise that should be fine.
>
> It also seems you've got the right packages installed. libltdl and
> libltdl-dev are there. The only difference to my own system that I can
> see is that your versions are a little bit newer. I still have libtool
> 2.26b and libltdl-dev 2.26b.
>
> Could you provide your config.log file? Maybe that holds some clues as
> to why it cannot detect libltdl properly.

Dear Kai,
 Thank you for responding so quickly. Attaching the config.log taken
from adonthell-build.

Hopefully it gives you some ideas that are unclear to me.

One another thing, I noticed when I compile adonthell there are quite
a few .la files which also become part of the system.

Below are a list of .la files which are due to adonthell :-

/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_world.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_input.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_gui.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_main.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_rpg.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_base.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_audio.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_event.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_gfx.la
/usr/local/src/lib/python2.6/site-packages/adonthell/_debug.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_main.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_py_main.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_base.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_gfx.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_event.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_python.la
/usr/local/src/lib/adonthell/input/_sdl.la
/usr/local/src/lib/adonthell/gfx/_sdl.la
/usr/local/src/lib/adonthell/main/_sdl.la
/usr/local/src/lib/adonthell/audio/_sdl.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_rpg.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_py_runtime.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_input.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_world.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_gui.la
/usr/local/src/lib/libadonthell_audio.la

I share this as I see not just Debian but many others GNU/Linuxes
moves away for having .la files. See it happening in Arch Linux,
Gentoo and quite a few others. It is a stated release goal in Debian.

http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval

There were around 1000+ LA files the last time I had checked around
(6+ months back) , now its down to something like 300+ so it seems
they will get it worked out to the barest minimum needed.

Just wanted to bring to your notice (if you didn't know).

Looking forward to info.

> Kai
>
> _______________________________________________
> Adonthell-general mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-general




-- 
          Regards,
          Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3  8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17

Attachment: config.log
Description: Text Data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]