|
From: | Armony ALTINIER |
Subject: | Re: [Audio-video] [Liberté 0] Re: http://audio-video.gnu.org/video/ghm2013/Samuel_Thibault_Jean-Philippe_Mengual-Freedom_0_for_everybody_really_.text |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:30:01 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 |
Le 23/07/2014 23:47, Richard Stallman a
écrit :
Not only, please see the UNO definition: http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=262[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] When we talk about human rights, we talk about humanity, not about a part of it. That's why it comes with a fight against discrimination. Discrimination is an active refusal to treat people equally. Yes it is, according to the international law. You can hurt somebody even if it is not what you intend to, and thus you are responsible.Developing a free program and not paying attention to accessibility is not discrimination. I am not twisting anything, just using the international definition.Your message is too long for me to respond to all the points in it. You have a habit of stretching and twisting words; Yes sir, it is ;)that's not valid reasoning. And this is mine: not sharing your limited definition doesn't make others' reasoning invalid. This is why it is important to have different approaches, to cover the many aspects of this so important notion for Humanity: Freedom.That response covers your many points. Your approach is valid of course, but ours too. Why do you deny us the right to have a complementary definiton? You even don't need to share our point of view, but please stop considering us as enemy, we are not. Armony --
Armony ALTINIER
|
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |