|
From: | Quiliro Ordóñez Baca |
Subject: | Re: [Audio-video] http://audio-video.gnu.org/video/ghm2013/Samuel_Thibault_Jean-Philippe_Mengual-Freedom_0_for_everybody_really_.text |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:21:41 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
This whole thing has opened my eyes about accessibility. Thank you very much. I do not think it should be necessary or convenient to use or change the FSF term coined in order to advance the use of accessibility. I think that it might be true that not making a program accessible would diminish the freedom a user has in practice (but not in rights). But appropriating the term "freedom to use" or "freedom 0" would lessen the importance and the strength of its battle. I would not want to support that. I would like to support the equal importance of both: software freedom and software accessibility. I would like a way to distinguish each other or to mix them without one denying the other in order strengthen both. Is it possible to provide this? -- Saludos libres, Quiliro Ordóñez 600 8579
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |