[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiomlately?
From: |
C Y |
Subject: |
RE: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiomlately? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:56:09 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Bill Page <address@hidden> wrote:
> The reason your edit to AldorForAxiom was being rejected is
> because the page contained at least one (actually there were
> several) occurrences of http:// Since the very aggressive link
> spam attach of last week that actually caused the wiki software
> to crash at one point, this common prefix for links has been
> banned on Axiom Wiki. Unfortunately this applies to both any new
> text you enter as well as any pre-existing source text on that
> page.
Ah ha! OK, that makes sense. I had been assuming that either a)
pre-existing links were OK in a re-save, or b) all existing links had
been converted. My mistake.
> You can still enter links however they must be written using
> WebSite: instead of http://, for example do not write:
>
> http://abc.com/help.html
>
> instead write:
>
> WebSite:abc.com/help.html
That's what I was looking for - just didn't get far enough into that
thread on my archives. Thanks!
> I have updated the text of AldorForAxiom to remove the http's
> so now you should be able to edit it.
Cool - I'll confirm that the libaxiom.mk fix is all that's needed and
then try again (building axiom silver now.)
> I am very sorry for the trouble. I need to think about some way
> of making the reason for the rejection and the way to get around
> it more obvious for people who want to post to the wiki.
No problem - thank you for putting the effort into keeping things
clean. It might be worth looking at wikipedia - I think they have some
kind of bot which inspects changes and disallows the obvious spam,
although that's based on a comment I saw and I don't know much about
it.
Cheers,
CY
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, (continued)
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, Bill Page, 2006/08/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/14
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, Bill Page, 2006/08/14
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/08/14
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, Alfredo Portes, 2006/08/14
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, Bob McElrath, 2006/08/14
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted tobuildAldor+Axiomlately?, William Sit, 2006/08/14
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted tobuildAldor+Axiomlately?, Simon Michael, 2006/08/14
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, Bill Page, 2006/08/13
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Has anybody attempted to buildAldor+Axiomlately?, Simon Michael, 2006/08/13
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiomlately?,
C Y <=
Re: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiom lately?, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, 2006/08/13