[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Signal names
From: |
Michael Beattie |
Subject: |
Re: Signal names |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:43:59 +1200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:39:17PM -0700, Tim Auckland wrote:
> That would work too. You can either generate tables, or use in-line
> logic. They are completely equivalent. I was thinking tables because
> that's the way cfengine is written at the moment, and I'm not familiar
> enough with the code to know if other aproaches would be more efficient.
Well, either way has to be better than hardcoding signal to number.
Mike.
--
Michael Beattie <address@hidden>
- Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/17
- Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Ted Zlatanov, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23