[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Signal names
From: |
Mark . Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: Signal names |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:17:55 +0200 (MET DST) |
That's what the OS does :-)
On 23 Apr, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:39:17PM -0700, Tim Auckland wrote:
>> That would work too. You can either generate tables, or use in-line
>> logic. They are completely equivalent. I was thinking tables because
>> that's the way cfengine is written at the moment, and I'm not familiar
>> enough with the code to know if other aproaches would be more efficient.
>
> Well, either way has to be better than hardcoding signal to number.
>
> Mike.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: address@hidden
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/17
- Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Ted Zlatanov, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Darrell Fuhriman, 2002/04/23