[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Signal names
|
From: |
Michael Beattie |
|
Subject: |
Re: Signal names |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:38:05 +1200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 07:16:25AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
>
> That's not a bad idea. Actually the main problem is to find these
> definitions. They are not always in signal.h. Often they are
> in a sub file like sys/signal.h, but as you would expect this is
> completely irrational.
Which, you will find, signal.h ultimately #includes.
Mike.
--
Michael Beattie <address@hidden>
- Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/17
- Re: Signal names, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names,
Michael Beattie <=
- Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Ted Zlatanov, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Darrell Fuhriman, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/23