[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Signal names with autoconf?
From: |
Michael Beattie |
Subject: |
Re: Signal names with autoconf? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 23:09:19 +1200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:52:11PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> Sorry, but this is nonsense. You haven't been following
> the discussion.
Bullshit Mark, I've been following it from the first post.
> First you have to find where the #defines are,
> and they are almost never in anything so obvious as signal.h
>
> solaris: sys/signal.h
> linux: bits/signum.h
There is such a thing as POSIX - I'm not sure if this is covered in
it, since I have not shelled out for the spec.
address@hidden:~> uname -s
Linux
address@hidden:~> grep signum /usr/include/signal.h
#include <bits/signum.h>
$ uname -s
SunOS
$ grep signal.h /usr/include/signal.h
#include <sys/signal.h>
> Then you need to process that file somehow to extract the
> name/number association and get it into a table. I was asking
> whether autoconf's expert knowledge and tools could make
> this easy.
Um, The whole Idea of headers is that they'll be processed, by the C
Pre Processor.
Dont use autoconf to do it, there is no need.
I dont understand why you cant just include the header, and use the SIG*
definitions. No need to clutter auto* with that.
Why do you need a table? Ok, I admit, I have not looked at the code for
the signal stuff, *yet*. but if you need a table, you can just use the
symbolic name and the #define'd value. "hup" and SIGHUP for example.
Instead of telling me this is nonsense, correct me. or give me a good
reason to shut up ;)
Mike.
--
Michael Beattie <address@hidden>
- Re: Signal names, (continued)
- Re: Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?,
Michael Beattie <=
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Ted Zlatanov, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Darrell Fuhriman, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Nicolas Chuche, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names, David Masterson, 2002/04/23