[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Signal names with autoconf?
From: |
Michael Beattie |
Subject: |
Re: Signal names with autoconf? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:37:24 +1200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 07:31:56AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
>
> I bet David Masterson would know if autoconf could be used to
> extract the signal names for each OS and build a table?
> David?
No no no no no.
signal.h includes the relevant headers one way or another to give you
the definitive #define's. Include signal.h, and you're set..
Take signal.h, follow its #includes.
Mike.
--
Michael Beattie <address@hidden>
- Re: Signal names, (continued)
- Re: Signal names, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: Signal names, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?,
Michael Beattie <=
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Ted Zlatanov, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Darrell Fuhriman, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, David Masterson, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: Signal names with autoconf?, Nicolas Chuche, 2002/04/23