[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[2]: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: Re[2]: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:04:00 +0100 |
On 1/10/06, Sergey Khorev <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Ok. It seems that Brandon and me can cover these tasks.
> I'll take a look what can be done for Open Watcom. If someone wants to use
> it, why
> not? Ppersonally I can't find sufficiently good reason to migrate to Watcom
> besides of
> probability to get slightly better optimised code.
It's mostly a free tool alternative, independent of M$ and suppossedly easy to
use. It's not the *main* alternative, but if we can support it without too much
hassle, we should.
>
> What is your position regarding resurrecting MSVC makefile and creating
> Watcom-specific Makefile?
I'll ressurrect makefile.vc and send you everything we currently have for
watcom.
Thanks for helping with this!
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, felix winkelmann, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, Bob McIsaac, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/01/11
Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed, felix winkelmann, 2006/01/09
Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. compiler semantics, Bob McIsaac, 2006/01/10