chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs


From: felix winkelmann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:10:45 +0200

On 7/31/06, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Next question: can the CMake build omit the "boot" and create the
> .c files in the toplevel directory?
> (I know you won't like it, but is it possible?)

The CMake build does have to remain two-stage, so "omit" is the wrong
word here.  I can change the directory structure so that the boot stuff
gets done in the main directory, and the final output gets done in a
/stagetwo directory.  This would allow ./configure to avoid messing with
any directory structure issues.

*.c vs. *.c.in is still an issue though.  What I'd like ./configure to
do, is distribute *.c.in files, and copy them at configure time to .c
files.  That keeps in-directory and out-of-directory builds from getting
clobbered.  How doable is this from your perspective?


Hm. I think I rather modify the autotools build to use "boot"...
Would that be ok?


cheers,
felix

--
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]