On 6/5/07, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
On 6/5/07, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Brandon Van Every scripsit:
> > Speed, to the exclusion of all other considerations, is not the real
> > world. I can understand compiling portable Scheme code under any 2
> > different compilers. I cannot fathom trying to get such code to
> > interoperate. This thread reads like a Frankenstein support
> > nightmare.
>
> Developing code under Chicken is fairly straightforward; developing
> code under Stalin is painful in the extreme. It therefore is plausible
> to have a Stalin-compatible library for Chicken that allows one to
> develop code that Stalin can handle after it is fully debugged under
> Chicken. You can then gain the advantages of Stalin's massive
> optimizations to gain execution speed.
>
BTW, has anyone gotten stalin to work lately? I ran my 512mb Athlon
for the whole night and was not able to compile stalin
0.11 (gcc 4.1.2).
Heh. Started purely out of curiosity... I'm not holding my breath:
18667 bagdanov 18 0 910m 432m 712 D 3.0 85.9 38:39.07 cc1
It's a 1Gb Athlon... And it's the DB server for my lab, so I'll have to kill it as soon as the students want to do any work. Well I'm not holding my breath for that either...
Cheers,
-Andy
cheers,
felix
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users