Re: [Denemo-devel] "Go To Next Interior End" Script. Maybe for git?

[Nils Gey]

> These empty measures are a nasty irregularity of Denemo. They cause
> unexpected cursor behavior.
> So I think we should think hard before we make these a feature, and
> start programming around them. 

Oh! This is unexpected, I always liked this about Denemo. These are very 
convenient if you compose with more than one staff. Its good you don't have to 
put rests in those measures, because naturally you want to fill these holes 
sometimes, and then you don't have to delete all those rests (you have to put 
in other notation software)

And I don't see how they misbehave. If they are blank, they get rests. Maybe 
this can be printed out as multi-measure rests, but otherwise I see no problem.

I created this script because I think of the "End"-key as a feature which jumps 
to the place where I have to compose/transcribe on. Usually this is the real 
end, but sometimes its just an empty measure because I already composed an End 
for all instruments, but a part between is missing in some staffs.

Nils


> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Interior is a translation of "Binnen" which is a German word for interior 
> > in the meaning of "Inland navigation/water", "Internal waters" or 
> > "Landlocked country".
> > 
> > So it means not the final end but a kind of end within the whole system.
> > 
> > You are right, your script is better. The (+i 0) was remaining garbage from 
> > my trials (and errors). Whats missing is the initial CursorRight, which is 
> > needed if you want to use this script consecutively. Just try it with and 
> > without (d-CursorRight)
> > 
> > 
> > (d-CursorRight)
> > (let gotoEnd () (if  (d-NextObject) (gotoEnd)))
> > (d-RefreshDisplay)
> > 
> > 
> > Nils
> > 
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:35:44 +0100
> > Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > This is great - I didn't know about named let before! When Jeremiah
> > > started contributing scripts I learnt about (define (proc)...) to avoid
> > > using (lambda...)
> > > Now about your script:
> > > 
> > > On my system this script just moves the cursor to the end.
> > > In fact several things puzzle me:
> > >   (+ i 0)
> > > is just i
> > > 
> > > so couldn't this script be written 
> > > 
> > > (let gotoEnd () (if  (d-NextObject) (gotoEnd)))
> > > (d-RefreshDisplay)
> > > 
> > > what did you mean - Interior End ?
> > > 
> > > Richard
> > > 
> > >  
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 16:24 +0200, Nils Gey wrote:
> > > > I bound that to Crtl+End on my system. Works pretty well.
> > > > Is this ready for git or is it bad scheme-style? 
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think I have write-rights for git.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ;;;;;Go to next Interior End
> > > > (d-CursorRight) ;starts with a forced step so the command becomes 
> > > > repeatable.
> > > > (let counter ((i 1)) 
> > > >   (if (d-NextObject)
> > > >         (counter (+ i 0))
> > > >    )
> > > >  )
> > > > (d-RefreshDisplay) ;Only one time refresh so it feels like a real jump, 
> > > > not a sequence of steps.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> 


-- 
Nils Gey <address@hidden>