[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Auth]Freport Update
From: |
Hans Zandbelt |
Subject: |
Re: [Auth]Freport Update |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:56:56 +0100 |
> You've just described the design of the Freport Databank retreival
> mechanism.
And a local Profile Manager!. So I guess we all agree that we
can make a robust secure implementation of a local Profile
Management system after all.
> > In this case, though, there's not much need for a Profile Manager; one
> > could just as easily use any sort of Web page (e.g. Geocities) to
> > store their Profiles which the client would go out and grab.
>
> Not the whole of the design of the protocol, but essentially.
> Login/Certification adds an extra layer of protocol complexity on top of
> HTTPS, and the connection needs to be stateful, but essentially and
> simplified yes.
In which case Geocities would be a remote Profile Manager...
Hans.
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, (continued)
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/16
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Hans Zandbelt, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, David Sugar, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Mike Warren, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Hans Zandbelt, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, John, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update,
Hans Zandbelt <=
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, John, 2002/03/16
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Hans Zandbelt, 2002/03/16
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, David Sugar, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Mike Warren, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, David Sugar, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Mike Warren, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, David Sugar, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Albert Scherbinsky, 2002/03/15
Re: [Auth]Freport Update, John, 2002/03/15