[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Licensing question.
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Licensing question. |
Date: |
16 Oct 2004 15:13:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
"Raven" <address@hidden> writes:
> I've written a toolkit/framework and an application based on that
> framework. Both are written in C#. They use .NET services like
> "System.Drawing", "System.Windows.Forms" etc.
>
> 3. My question is: if I use DotGNU to make my toolkit/framework and
> my application work under Linux, do they fall in the category of the
> above-mentioned "independent module" ?? Can I freely use dotGNU to
> adapt {Windows/.NET closed-source, commercial applications} to run
> under Linux??? Are there any limitations??
>
> Answer to this question is very important for me and my development
> team... so please give a reply or redirect me to another place where
> I could ask my question.
The simplest answer is: consider that what you can legally do with
DotGNU Portable .NET is a superset of what you can legally do with
MS.NET.
--
Stephen Compall or s11 or sirian
Nouvelle cuisine, n.:
French for "not enough food".
Continental breakfast, n.:
English for "not enough food".
Tapas, n.:
Spanish for "not enough food".
Dim Sum, n.:
Chinese for more food than you've ever seen in your entire life.
MD5 Mafia embassy USCOI nitrate Honduras class struggle Verisign
e-cash JPL blackjack undercover NWO Mole bce