Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing

[Kenneth Loafman]

Peter Schuller wrote:
>> Is anyone familiar enough with WebDAV to say off the top of your head what
>> the correct interpretation is here? It should not be a huge problem to add
>> support for absolute URL:s, but it would help to have some background on
>> the protocol.
> 
> To be clearer; one simple fix is to just ignore the scheme and host portion. 
> But what is correct behavior if, for example, the scheme/host does not match 
> that which was used in accessing the document? Is this supported/required to 
> be supported by webdav?
> 
> My suggestion right now is to ensure the scheme/host matches, and then ignore 
> it (barring someone doing something more proper). This shoud work in this 
> case, and it should hopefully remain safe for any use in the future where it 
> does *not* match (erroring out with a suitable message).
> 
> Provided I can conjure up a webdav account I'll implement such a change, if 
> no 
> one objects to the above.

Thanks Peter.  I think this is the correct solution and should work.
I'm not familiar enough with WebDAV to know if its indeed the right
solution, but if it works... let's go with it for now.

...Ken

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature