[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing
From: |
Peter Schuller |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 01:09:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
> TypeError: exceptions must be classes, instances, or strings
> (deprecated), not unicode
Oops. This was me accidentally leaving an exceptoin as a string (deprecated
since a long time and no longer allowed in python 2.5). I meant to figure out
an appropriate exception for it, but neglected to.
In any case, that is supposed to be triggered when the hostname that appears
in the URL given back to it by the webdav server does not exactly match that
used in the request.
Is this the case in your use? (I assume the "server" bits are transcribed to
avoid leaking confidential informaiton)
Do the URL:s for example use a more fully qualified hostname, or an alternate
hostname, than the one used as part of the target URL to duplicity?
I was not sure whether to really add that check, since this type of issue
would be expected.
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/04
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing,
Peter Schuller <=
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/08
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Darik Horn, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/09
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/09
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/09
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/10