[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing
From: |
Peter Schuller |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:40:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
> Yes, the actual line with which I invoke duplicity is (username
> obfuscated):
>
> duplicity --no-encryption
> webdav://address@hidden@dav.messagingengine.com/user.provider.tld/f
> iles/backup ~/tmp/backup
Ok. Will look into this bit some more; perhaps the address@hidden is causing
problems since urlparse does not support it.
But either way your results confirm that the original problems goes away when
the scheme is http.
So, we seem to be at the state of having the following problems:
(1) https is treated as an unknown scheme, for some reason I don't understand.
The fact that you have reproduced it on both cygwin and a gentoo linux
installation makes it even more puzzling to me.
(2) The patch must be augmented to properly handle address@hidden style URL:s
and
any other special handling already done by duplicity.
(3) It is still unknown to me what the proper behavior would be if the server
returns a URL that points to a completely different host. I took a quick look
at the webdav RFC but didn't find a clear answer by just sifting. If anyone
has more input here, it would be appreciated.
I'll look into (2) and either look into (3) or avoid the issue for now by
keeping the requirement that the urls match. For (1), I'm not really sure
what to do unless I can reproduce it locally somehow and investigate in
detail.
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/07
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing,
Peter Schuller <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/08
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Darik Horn, 2008/03/08
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/09
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/09
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/09
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Thorsten Kampe, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Re: Re: First restore failing, Peter Schuller, 2008/03/10