Re: [Dvipng] disappearing branches with qtree

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Also sprach Jan-Åke Larsson:
> Possibly dvips understands "B" as "bind def", I do not know. There is
> certainly no header included in your file that defines "B".

Hm, I just saw that dvips-generated postscript files usually contain 
definitions like

begin/N{def}def/B{bind def}N

I am not familar with PostScript, but doesn't that mean that "B" is defined as 
an alias to "bind def" by dvips? Thus, the code in the pgf file would be 
valid, wouldn't it?

Jürgen