[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:14:20 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:04:18 +0900
> From: Martin Duerst <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> >2. When the created file is read (again) for editing, these strings
> > should be seen (on screen) EXACTLY as it was when it was entered.
>
> If using the same editor, definitely. But we also found that there
> can be some personal preferences, so if you changed your preferences,
> the display would change.
That's actually a bad idea, IMHO: the text should be saved so that any
other bidi-enabled editor will display it the same. That is why
fiddling with Unicode character properties is something I feel we
should not do: those properties are the only common denominator of all
bidi editors.
I still don't understand why you are opposed to using RLM, LRM, and
other special characters reserved by Unicode: after all, if the result
is displayed by a bidi-compatible program, they will always behave
according to UAX#9. (In XML and similar files, we could use HTML/XML
directives instead of the literal RLM etc. when saving the file, but
the principle remains the same: whenever the default character
properties yield wrong display, use the explicit directional marks to
fix that.)
- [emacs-bidi] Re: state of BIDI within stable GNU emacs (UTF8) nikud, (continued)
- [emacs-bidi] Re: state of BIDI within stable GNU emacs (UTF8) nikud, Uwe Brauer, 2005/11/23
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: state of BIDI within stable GNU emacs (UTF8) nikud, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/23
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: state of BIDI within stable GNU emacs (UTF8)nikud, Martin Duerst, 2005/11/23
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: state of BIDI within stable GNU emacs (UTF8)nikud, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/24
- [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?, Martin Duerst, 2005/11/28
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?, Gregg Reynolds, 2005/11/28
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/28
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?, Martin Duerst, 2005/11/29
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?, Ehud Karni, 2005/11/29
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?, Martin Duerst, 2005/11/30
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?, Gregg Reynolds, 2005/11/29
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Callbacks?, Martin Duerst, 2005/11/30
- [emacs-bidi] Re: Callbacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/28
- [emacs-bidi] Re: Callbacks?, Martin Duerst, 2005/11/29
- [emacs-bidi] Re: Callbacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/29
- [emacs-bidi] Re: Callbacks?, Martin Duerst, 2005/11/30
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: Callbacks?, Gregg Reynolds, 2005/11/30
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: Callbacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/30
- [emacs-bidi] Re: Callbacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/30