Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el

[Eli Zaretskii]

On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Richard Stallman wrote:

>       We should indeed
>     have an input method that produces Unicode Hebrew characters (except
>     that it's not very practical now, since bidirectional editing isn't
>     yet supported).
> 
> If latin-ltx  generates the mathematical aleph, beth... and we have
> this new input method for Unicode aleph, beth..., will that satisfy
> everyone?

At least as far as Hebrew users are concerned, I think it will.

If we turn on Dave's unify-on-* modes by default, it's possible we won't 
even need to add a second Hebrew input method, but instead have only one, 
the one we have now in leim/quail/hebrew.el (perhaps with a few changes).