[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale
From: |
Roozbeh Pournader |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 02:24:01 +0330 (IRT) |
On 19 Dec 2001, Dave Love wrote:
> > There are UTF-8 locales in use (e.g., vi_VI), which do NOT have
> > UTF-8 in their name,
>
> That looks like a bad example since, at least in glibc 2.2.4, the
> locale is listed as `vi_VN.UTF-8'. That's fortunate, since Emacs uses
> VISCII for the unqualified Vietnamese language environment.
> (Similarly for Devanagari.
Will you accept 'fa_IR' as another example?
roozbeh
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/18
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Tomohiro KUBOTA, 2001/12/18
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/18
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Dave Love, 2001/12/19
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/19
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/19
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Dave Love, 2001/12/21
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/22
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Dave Love, 2001/12/21
Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Dave Love, 2001/12/19
- Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale,
Roozbeh Pournader <=
Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/12/23
Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale, Kenichi Handa, 2001/12/24