[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Jon Cast |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:15:55 -0500 |
Stefan Monnier <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
> > > That when it was decided that 21.3 would also be a bugfix
> > > release, several :version and make-obsolete statements had to be
> > > updated to say "21.4" instead of "21.3". A quick grep shows
> > > that not all of the occurrences have been updated yet.
> > You do realize this cannot happen with either my scheme or yours,
> > right? So it has nothing to do with which scheme is adopted.
> I understand that my scheme is AA.BB while yours is A.A.BB. The use
> of BB as the "bugfix" indicator is common to both proposals and
> that's the one I mostly care about.
I'm confused: if you `mostly care about' BB, why spend so much time
arguing with Miles and me?
> If people prefer using CC.AA.BB, that's fine by me, but as far as
> I'm concerned the distinction between major and really-major
> releases is too fuzzy to be worth the trouble.
What trouble? The trouble of converting to a three-element system
(i.e., using fully general lexical ordering rather than un-rolling the
loops), or the trouble of changing things if what we thought was x.y
turns out to be (x+1).1? Nobody's asking you to take any trouble
about the first case, and I doubt the second case will be important
enough to bother you.
> All I care about is that each CVS branch have its own "major" number
> so it is independent from the others. Whether those numbers look
> like AA or A.A (i.e. "22" or "22.2") is not really important to me
> and (I believe) in general.
This is something I've never understood: why do people who don't care
about the answer spend so much time on the question? Why not just let
those who do care decide?
> Since I find it unimportant, I don't think it's worth the trouble
> (since it would be a change that requires hacking).
This change should require 0 trouble to you, since no one's asking
anything of you. I'll do all the work to set it up, and I don't think
any further work will be required. How can it not be worth that to
you?
> Stefan
Jon Cast
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Jon Cast <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Simon Josefsson, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Simon Josefsson, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/05