[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @ |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 2003 12:41:10 -0400 |
> Before my patch, the behavior was that after insertion of
> a skeleton, point would be placed at "the first occurrence of _
> or at the end of the skeleton".
>
> What my patch changed is that point after insertion of a skeleton
> is now placed at "the first occurrence of _ or @
> or at the end of the skeleton".
>
> Couldn't you get the same result with the old code
> by writing @ _?
That changes the place where the region is inserted
if the region is active when the skeleton is executed.
Stefan
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, (continued)
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2003/04/03
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/09
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/09
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/10
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/10
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/11
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/11
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/11
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/12
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/13
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/13
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/13
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/20
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/23