[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: customize-apropos
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: customize-apropos |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:03:23 -0600 (CST) |
Drew Adams wrote:
Your doc-string changes correctly reflect the current prefix-arg behavior -
the arg distinguishes customizable variables from other variables. However,
wouldn't it also be useful to be able to distinguish all user variables
(options) - whether customizable or not - from internal variables?
Yes, but is it useful to have them in a Custom buffer?
M-x apropos-variable will show all (loaded) user-options (defined with
defcustom or docstring starting with a `*') and with a numeric arg it
shows all variables. Of course, it will not show them in a Custom buffer.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/09
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/09
- Re: customize-apropos, Kim F. Storm, 2005/12/10
- Re: customize-apropos, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/11
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/11
- Re: customize-apropos,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/13
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/13
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/13