[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disabled commands
From: |
Giorgos Keramidas |
Subject: |
Re: Disabled commands |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:43:22 +0200 |
On 2006-02-13 10:26, "Kim F. Storm" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bill Wohler <address@hidden> writes:
> > I'm with you. I never heard about it until now. It might explain some
> > weird unexplained behavior I've noticed over the years. If innocuous
> > commands such as narrow-to-region and eval-expression are disabled,
> > then surely such a dangerous command as not-modified should be disabled.
>
> I agree that this is a very dangerous command.
> [...]
> > Thanks for the heads-up, I've just added
> >
> > (put 'not-modified 'disabled t)
>
> So did I.
Lurking here has proven very educational. So did I :)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/08
- Disabled commands (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Disabled commands (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/10
- Re: Disabled commands, Bill Wohler, 2006/02/13
- Re: Disabled commands, Kim F. Storm, 2006/02/13
- Re: Disabled commands,
Giorgos Keramidas <=
- Re: Disabled commands, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/13
- Re: Disabled commands, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/02/09
- RE: Risky local variable mechanism, Drew Adams, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/11