Re: Problems with the url package on w32?

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I.e. C-c C-a fails to apply the hunk (i.e. doesn't change the buffer at
>> all), and correctly tells the user about this failure?
>> 
>> If so, it's a "minor" bug.

> No. C-c C-a says "hunk applied" (something like that) and the hunk is
> *not* applied.

Then it's not like 3 and it's a major bug.  If it says "applied" it should
have been applied.

>> I'd be interested to learn more about it, so please send me the data next
>> time you encounter such a case.
> I'll do.

Thanks,


        Stefan